The latest medical research on Plastic Surgery

This systematic review delves into the impact of social media on self-perception and the escalating interest in clinical aesthetic procedures, proposing that social media significantly influences beauty standards and increases demand for aesthetic enhancements.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The quantitative analysis demonstrated a strong positive correlation between social media usage and the consideration of aesthetic procedures (r=0.45, p<0.001), indicating a significant impact. Specific findings included a large effect size (Cohen's d=0.8) for the relationship between time spent on social media and the desire for aesthetic enhancements. Individuals spending more than 3 hours per day on social media platforms were twice as likely to consider aesthetic procedures compared to those with less usage, with a 95% confidence interval indicating robustness in these findings.

Confirming the reinforcing effect of social media on aesthetic decision-making, this study highlights the complex interplay between digital media exposure, altered self-perception, and the increased inclination towards aesthetic procedures. It suggests a critical need for practitioners to carefully navigate the digital influence on patient's desires, reinforcing the significance of understanding psychological motivations and societal pressures in clinical aesthetics. This comprehensive analysis offers pivotal insights for clinical practice and ongoing research into social media's role in contemporary beauty standards.

To compare the outcomes of two types of tarsoconjunctival pedicle flaps for reconstruction of large lower eyelid defects.

Retrospective medical record review of consecutive patients who underwent centrally-based or laterally-based tarsoconjunctival pedicle transconjunctival flap for lower eyelid reconstruction for defects greater than 50% of the lid margin. Full thickness skin grafts were used for anterior lamellar reconstruction in all cases. The primary outcome measure was eyelid position, function and satisfactory cosmesis.

Forty-three patients were identified. Twenty-six patients underwent reconstruction with a centrally-based tarsoconjunctival pedicle flap; 17 patients underwent reconstruction with a laterally-based tarsoconjunctival pedicle flap. The average size of the lid defect was 77.7% (range 50-100%) in the central group and 75% (range 50-100%) in the lateral group (p=0.604). Mean follow up time was 61.5 weeks in the central group and 46.6 weeks in the lateral group (p=0.765). After division of the flap and during follow up, 27% of the centrally based group required revisional surgery with none in the laterally based group (p=0.03). 100% of the patients with centrally based flaps required second staged division of flap, whereas only 52% of patients with a laterally based flaps underwent second staged flap division. (p<0.001).

Outcome suggests that for reconstruction of large lower lid defects requiring lid sharing procedures, both centrally and lateral-based procedures have equivalent functional outcome. However, the laterally based group has less need for revisional procedures and may not need a second stage division of the flap.

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries can result in significant functional impairments and long-term sequelae. This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of a chitosan tube implantation protecting the epineural coaptation after peripheral nerve injuries using two different tube versions (V 1.0 and V 2.0 with different wall thickness and resorption characteristics) compared to a control group. The study focused on pain levels, sensory function, and overall functional outcomes.

Patients who received tube implantation around direct coaptation sites of digital nerves were prospectively randomized and compared to control patients without additional tube protection. Pain levels, sensory function, grip force, and functional scores were assessed at different time points, ranging from three months to five years after the procedure. Furthermore, biodegradation of the tubes was measured via high-resolution MR-neurography (MRN) and categorized.

Long-term evaluation revealed that patients with V 1.0 had higher pain levels compared to the control group after five years. They also reported more symptoms of numbness and hypersensitivity. V 2.0 patients exhibited higher pain levels at three months, which did not persist at six months. However, they showed compromised sensory function, with higher values of two-point discrimination compared to V 1.0 and the control group. No differences were found in grip force or functional scores between the groups. MRI displayed remnants of implants even in long-term follow-up.

The findings suggest potential limitations due to pain increase and impaired sensory function associated with tube implantation in the long term. However, in the short term, the material seemed to have a protective effect (as published previously). The resorption process was not completed at the end of the observation period of five years. This might explain the prolonged scarring and inferior long-term results. Future research should focus on improving tube materials and design to minimize adverse effects and enhance functional outcomes in patients with peripheral nerve injuries.